Which approach is most suited for minimizing evaluation bias for English language learners?

Using a combination of formal and informal assessments is particularly effective in minimizing evaluation bias for English language learners because it provides a more holistic view of the learner's abilities and knowledge. Formal assessments, such as standardized tests, are often limited in their ability to accurately reflect the skills of a student who may not be fully proficient in English. On the other hand, informal assessments, such as observations, interviews, and performance-based tasks, can give educators insight into the student's understanding and skills in different contexts, allowing for a more equitable evaluation.

This approach also recognizes that language proficiency does not fully capture a student's cognitive abilities or potential. By utilizing various assessment methods, educators can gather a wide range of evidence that reflects the student's learning in multiple areas, thus reducing the likelihood of bias that may arise from reliance on a single method, especially one that may favor native English speakers. This comprehensive assessment strategy ensures that the unique strengths and needs of English language learners are acknowledged and supported.