MEGA Cross Categorical Special Education Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Enhance your knowledge for the MEGA Cross Categorical Special Education Test. Explore interactive flashcards and multiple choice questions with explanations. Prepare for your certification with confidence!

Practice this question and more.


What is the school's legal obligation in regards to an Individualized Education Program (IEP) that cannot be fully funded?

  1. Provide only half of the services immediately

  2. Meet all the requirements of the IEP regardless of cost

  3. Arrange for services in another school district

  4. Modify the IEP to include only services that can be provided

The correct answer is: Meet all the requirements of the IEP regardless of cost

The school's legal obligation regarding an Individualized Education Program (IEP) is to meet all the requirements of the IEP regardless of cost. This stems from the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which mandates that students with disabilities must receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE). The IEP outlines specific services and supports that a student requires in order to make progress in their education. The key principle is that the IEP is designed to meet the unique needs of each student, and schools are legally obligated to provide the services specified in the IEP, ensuring that they have access to the resources and support necessary for their education. If a school faces challenges in funding and resource availability, it cannot simply choose to provide only partial services or modify the IEP arbitrarily. Instead, it must ensure that all required services are provided, seeking alternative funding sources or different service delivery options if necessary to fulfill that legal obligation. The other options, like providing only half of the required services or modifying the IEP without proper process, do not align with legal requirements and can deny students the services they need. Arranging services in another district might not be feasible or compliant with the specific needs outlined in the IEP. Ultimately, the law emphasizes the